Classics Dystopian Uncategorized

1984

 
Author: George Orwell
Genre: Dystopian
Pages/Length: 391 pages

★★★★☆ 4 stars

Book Summary:
Winston Smith is a member of the Party of Oceania, which, under the rule of “Big Brother”, forbids individualistic thinking. However, in a society where the goal is to conform, Winston’s divergent thoughts send him down a dangerous path that could ultimately cost him his life…

Book Review:
As soon as I started this book, it felt like I was reading a primary source that I would’ve stumbled upon in history class. It is a very dense read and took me a while to get through. However, once I got used to the language, I was intrigued by the unsettling plot and I started to appreciate the realistic and historical feel. So much of it applies to the real world and it’s truly fascinating to experience how scary it is to live under a despotic, totalitarian regime. It’s such a smart novel and there were also some lines where I would just close the book and think for a while about what I just read. I would not only recommend this novel to dystopian lovers, but to history buffs as well. The only criticism I have is that it tended to be very dragged on at times. Between the extremely long paragraphs and the uncomfortable, slightly far fetched romance, I often found myself just wanting it to end.

Quotes:
“It struck him as curious that you could create dead men but not living ones. Comrade Ogilvy, who had never existed in the present, now existed in the past, and when once the act of forgery was forgotten, he would exist just as authentically, and upon the same evidence, as Charlemagne or Julius Caesar.”
“In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance.”
“A general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another.”
“Nothing exists except through human consciousness.”
“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that could be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good’, what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well- better, because it’s an exact opposite in itself. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning, or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still.”
“In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible because there will be no words in which to express it.”
“Inequality was the unalterable law of human life.”
“The aim of the High is to remain here they are. The aim of the Middle is to change places with the High. The aim of the low, when they have an aim- for it is an abiding characteristic of the law that they are too much crushed by drudgery to be more than intermittently conscious of anything outside their daily lives- is to abolish all distinctions and create a society in which all men are equal.”
“From the point of view of the law, no historic change has ever meant much more than a change in the name of their masters.”
“’Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.’”
“’Slavery is freedom. Alone-free-the human being is always defeated. It must be so, because every human being is doomed to die which is the greatest of all failures. But if he can make a complete, utter submission, if he can escape from his identity, if he can merge himself in the party so that he is the party, then he is all-powerful and immortal.’”

Spoilers:
I wish that this book was shorter. A lot of it is very dragged on, like the Julia/Winston romance (which also happened to be a little disturbing and sudden for me) and many of the paragraphs were exhausting to read. I actually liked the ending a lot though, I’m a big fan of unhappy endings and I think the fact that Big Brother won made the message so much more powerful. Actually reading this book, I found it mediocre, but every day I look back my appreciation for it grows.

Recommended Posts